| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 |

Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 31, 2009 at 05:10 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Excluding the
bottomless pit of Wall Street executives now tarred and feathered to satisfy
the constituents of the "blameless" U.S. congress, the Big Three
automaker CEOs rank second as they were publicly chastised for their own
inadequacies. While much blame has been rightfully bestowed on Ford, GM and
Chrysler for declining from market dominators to market losers, it is necessary
to acknowledge that auto manufacturers didn't lead the U.S. Economy into
recession.
It seems ironic that while the U.S. Banking sector
evolved too quickly and endorsed derivative instruments it didn't fully
understand the Big Three U.S. auto manufacturers have lagged in adapting to the
demand shift from "gas guzzlers" to economical driving machines over
the past 10 years. Both industries have been laden with errors in judgment, yet
the banking system is essential to economic growth in all sectors while auto
manufacturers reorganizing under chapter 11 bankruptcy will allow only isolated
damage as automakers emerge leaner and stronger.
Interestingly the administration with the
"right stuff" to endorse such policy decided instead to supersede the
refusal by congress and grant GM and Chrysler loans from the TARP fund. The
loans designed as bridge financing totaled $17.4 billion and were expected to
ensure that the two companies met their debt obligations through March 2009.
The more conservative Bush administration
failed to allow the auto makers to reap what they have sown, even as GM's cash
burn rate clocked in at $4.7 billion in 2008 Q3. President Obama announced Monday
that the government would finance GM working capital for two months ending in
June 2009 and will keep Chrysler afloat for thirty days allowing time for the proposed
Fiat deal to buy a 35% stake in the company to be reached. If the Fiat deal is successful
Obama pledged to offer an additional $6 billion of capital to bring the deal to
fruition. The President is taking a hard stance on the issue and suggested that
if the companies cannot find a solid footing on their own by the deadlines announced,
the companies will be allowed to enter bankruptcy with the “backing” of the
United States government.
GM and Chrysler
both structured their first loan from Uncle Sam with the premise that demand
for automobiles in the U.S. would average 12 million vehicles over the course
of 2009, but statements from GM President Fritz Henderson in January 2009
reassessed projected 2009 auto sales closer to 10.5 million units. Earlier this
month GM and Chrysler pleaded for an extra $22 billion, citing talks with bond to
convert debt into equity shares as evidence of their ability to survive with
the government’s help. However, one must wonder whether the holders of
relatively secure debt will convert their investment into equity shares given
language from Washington on Monday, suggesting stockholders could be wiped out.
Rick Wagoner, CEO of General Motors, announced his resignation Sunday ahead of the U.S. government’s announcement of its stringent requirements for the automakers on Monday. Wagoner had been at GM for a total of 32 years and had served the past nine as the company’s CEO. As captain of the sinking ship he saw GM replaced by Toyota as the U.S. market leader in car sales and is responsible for the lack of forward vision in the new millennium. His removal from the company is not only symbolic of change to come, but a signal to the industry that the Obama administration will not tolerate complacency in the increasingly competitive environment challenging automakers.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 31, 2009 at 02:08 AM in Soap Box | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
U.S. equities felt strong selling pressure in pre-market trading Friday due to expected yet unfortunate economic data. Markets were unable to build optimism throughout the day Friday as the overbought tech rally ran out of gas and all indexes ended the day down; DJIA -1.87%, S&P 500 -2.03%, NASDAQ -2.63%.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 28, 2009 at 05:05 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Crude began to rally early Thursday as U.S. commodity markets opened on positive news that 2008 Q4 GDP numbers were not as terrible as expected. Futures prices are completely ignoring the stockpiles of crude throughout developed countries, in the Arab world, and floating off-shore in tankers. While WTI crude futures were trading below $45/barrel they were argued to be cheap, since which time markets have priced the black gold commodity higher by 20%. The previous levels were optimistic that demand would increase and macro economic data would turn favorable.
To traders who profited from buying DIG or USO while crude was trading
near $40/barrel, congratulations, take profits and reverse it. The "re-flation” trade, Chinese stimulus promises,
and Thursday's less terrible than expected GDP report have provided enough
froth for commodities to float above realistic valuations. Now is the time to
take account of the meaningful forward indicators of economic activity and
detach the rear view mirror.
The supply of crude grew by 3.3 million barrels compared to 2.0 million barrels the week before, according to the EIA Petroleum Status Report on Wednesday. U.S. inventories of crude are at levels above 360 million barrels and are higher than any at any point in the last three years. Refiners are operating at 82% capacity with room to scale up production over time, yet draws in gasoline supply won't have an immediate impact on the prices of crude due to supply gluts. Refiners will moreover be less inclined to scale up production given jobless claims data released Thursday, which suggests it is unlikely that U.S. consumers will increase their consumption of fuel.
The long term trend
of crude oil will be to the upside, but the immediate macro and micro economic threats
make the case for active traders to short the USO, while a substantial
pullback of crude towards $40/barrel will offer an opportunity to get long the USO for "buy and hold" investors.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM in Trade Strategies | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
U.S. equities have charged from 666 to 821 in the S&P 500 index, catalyzed by the removal of bankruptcy risk from the financial sector. While prominent fears that the government would nationalize TARP banks pulled the broad market to its bottom, the new found confidence in financials naturally led stocks to surge across the board, settling at their recent levels.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 26, 2009 at 05:33 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
The mass of unanswerable questions facing investors navigating this market are nothing less than maddening. Will the economy depreciate back to its lows after such a strong rally? Will the Treasury plan to buy distressed assets help or hurt banks? Yet it is the most pivotal query, concerning when the housing market will recover, that will foretell the “homecoming” of risk to one’s portfolio. As of late the root cause of the economic downturn has been overshadowed, despite the extensive and relentless housing sales decline, by the housing derived chaos within the financial system.
Tim Geithner has finally announced the details of the Treasury’s public/private toxic asset sale proposal. Under the plan the government will buy mortgage backed securities using remaining TARP funds and leverage, while also lending money to a select few institutions to will buy the securities. While the plan provides the option to sell troubled assets, U.S. banks will be selling the assets for considerably less than the projected value over the long term and would be forced to write down more losses.
Able and rational banks will not choose to sell mortgage backed assets at a loss. Simultaneously financial firms are incentivized to return TARP funds as quickly as possible as they avoid losing their “top talent” to firms exempt from the stifling government compensation caps. Assuming that banks act in the best interest of their shareholders it is increasingly likely that these banks will not endorse further lending because such policies would put firms at a competitive disadvantage.
The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) has reported increases in mortgage applications in recent weeks due to 30 yr fixed rates hovering around 5% at prime. Some of the refinancing may stifle the rate of foreclosure, yet the national delinquency rate of home loans climbed at an accelerating pace to 7.88% in the fourth quarter of last year. Still more frightening is the level of sub-prime delinquencies, the same mortgages to which the banks’ “toxic assets” are tethered, which reached 21.88% in 2009 Q4.
In a press release on March 5, 2009, the MBA stated, “We will continue to see, however, a shift away from delinquencies tied to the structure and underwriting quality of loans to mortgage delinquencies caused by job and income losses.” The unemployment rate has continued to climb at an increasing rate from 7.6% to 8.1% in February and is expected to rise to over 9% by year end (the worst since early 1980’s), corroborating the projection by the MBA of more delinquencies in months to come.
It is important to consider the “worst case scenario” announced by the President and the Treasury, which will be applied to TARP recipient banks, which allows for 8.9% unemployment and a further 15% drop in home prices. Why would a first time home owner buy a home that may decrease in value by 15% during their first year of ownership?
While U.S. equity markets have made a roaring rally from 666 to 824 on the S&P 500, all evidence suggests that significant headwinds face the U.S. and global economy moving forward. Banks have not substantially increased lending, delinquencies and foreclosures continue to rise, the secondary effects of the jobless rate on the housing sector and broader economy have yet to be seen, and the sentiment of first time home buyers couldn’t be worse. It is delusional to anticipate the recent rally will lead us out of the recession we have endured for the past two years and miraculously change the real economic problems facing consumers and firms alike.
The single most influential forward indicator of a real housing rebound and a derived economic recovery is the level of unemployment, as job security determines the ability and willingness of consumers to buy homes. Until the acceleration of new and continuing jobless claims recedes it is prudent for investors to realize the true and dismal state of the economy.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 25, 2009 at 07:05 AM in Soap Box | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Bulls found evidence to further their exposure to U.S. equities on Monday as markets climbed to post the largest daily increase of the new year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) gained nearly 500 points and the S&P 500 soared 7%. The surfacing of a tangible Treasury plan to create the promised "public/private investment program" drove the TARP banks nearly 20% higher. Also notable was the 5.5% surprise to the upside of Existing Home Sales data in February on a month to month basis.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 24, 2009 at 06:17 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Regardless of how often one tracks the health of the stock market during these turbulent times, it would be impossible to ignore the fury of the recent rally in U.S. equity markets. Many have called for this rally to be the first leg of the recession's bottom and for investors to get long into U.S. stocks. Browse through my recent posts and you'll find a case being made for the S&P 500 to reach 840 before a significant pullback. Turning to a change in sentiment where the market plowed through economic data at or slightly above consensus estimates it was tempting to trust that the market could break 800 on the S&P.
As it happens the 800 level, a technical 50 day SMA (Simple Moving Average) and strong psychological level, was too strong for the S&P 500 to close above on Wednesday. Bank stocks have been overbought from their lows but many expected other sectors to take some leadership if the financial sector could simply move "sideways".
Unfortunately, most of these hopes aren't materializing. Financials trading at P/E ratios synonymous with growth have been too rich for most, resulting in a sharp decline for the overall financial sector. Weakness in basic materials, energy and consumer discretionary stocks on Friday is bearish for the market and these sectors will suffer much worse if housing sales data for February comes in much below estimates.
The only trade that I could sleep with is that of shorting financials. Congress seems to be trying to run the very banks THEY OWN out of business by converting them to non-profits. By taxing the talent of these firms at 90%, the goverment is going to chase the talent to the banks who first return the TARP money or worse to countries outside of the United States! If financials drop the market will fall with them and if the market drops the financials will fall harder.
Take profits and enjoy the weekend!
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 21, 2009 at 04:16 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Growth in U.S. equity markets over the past two weeks has been fueled by new found confidence in the banking sector as XLf, the Financial Select Sector SPDR, as it has driven higher by 52% at the close on Thursday. The decline in bank stocks over the past two days has caused the Dow 30 to decline as AIG, C and BAC have pulled the index lower.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 21, 2009 at 01:21 AM in Market Synopsis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
Up until this point the Oil story has been somewhat perplexing. Investors couldn't get a handle on whether the WTI crude futures were trading too expensively in the high 40 dollar range because (1) U.S. dollar strength has been keeping the commodity cheap, (2) demand seems to have bottomed but the fundamentals of the economy are still headwinds and (3) the inventories of refined gasoline and crude oil sitting in tankers hasn't made a convincing swing to negative growth.
Posted by Robert Eberenz on March 19, 2009 at 03:30 PM in Trade Strategies | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog | | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |
