The last week has seen 100 day moving averages torn apart, surprises from economic data reports, and one of the most notable sell-offs for stocks in some time. Recently, many home gamers and pros alike, have put financials out of their purview. The erratic and effectively risky nature of these names are less than inviting, but there are opportunities to profit from what has happened and what will happen next.
Where We've Been
1.) The iShares Dow Jones US Financial Sector Index (DJUSFI) ETF (IYF) has rallied 34% in the last 52 weeks, to 51.51 on February 4, 2010.
2.) The DJUSFI itself, which IYF is designed to mimic, presently totes a 61.07 trailing p/e when accounting for earnings losses.
3.) The DJUSFI's forward p/e appears reasonable at 13.36 when accounting for positive and negative earnings, yet the expectations of future earnings, used to compute this number, are based on a full scale U.S. economic recovery.
4.) Higher p/e ratios are tolerated as upside earnings surprises have helped to keep multiples low throughout the latter half of 2009.
Consider the possibility that your view is now the byproduct of a positive feedback loop, fueled by a bias that is based on a string of positive surprises. Statistics reminds us to rely only on pertinent, non random, past data when forming hypotheses and to discard random events, disguised as oracles.
Signal Flares
Looking ahead, we see a trend forming in the very sector which plagued the economy into recession. New home sales have fallen to 342,000 units in December (just above the March 2009 low) after the initial housing stimulus expired and a new incentive package failed to pick up the slack. Simultaneously the Case-Shiller resold home price index stalled in October and November and existing home sales in December tanked to the lowest level since August. Most disconcerting was the jump in months supply of existing homes which jumped almost a full month to 7.2 months worth of housing inventory.
Where the Money Came From
Banks have profited from three factors in the latter three quarters of 2009 that could actually hurt them in 2010. (1) It's no secret that the Federal Reserve propped up the nations largest banks through the largest liquidity campaign in the history. Mortgages are still being purchased by the Fed, but they have vowed to quit the purchases of MBS from Fannie and Freddie by the end of March. These purchases allowed potential buyers of similar assets on private balance sheets to find a market price and risk taking re-entered the market. (2) Once it was clear that banks weren't going to fail or be nationalized the first leg of the rally carried prices from book values near .50 to levels nearer to fair value. At this point , it was still understood that the "infected" TARP banks would need some wiggle room to begin lending and get their capital requirements up to par. The answer was found in the repealing of "mark to market" accounting (FASB 157), where banks were suddenly able to keep Real Estate Owned (REO) properties, which had been foreclosed and seized by the bank, on their balance sheet at a price estimated by the bank itself. (3) The rally, which resulted from the new found faith in the financial system as a whole, carried confidence and thus risky investments into the market. This return to risk naturally benefited banks through increased fees and expenses from their brokerage arms and increased profits from proprietary trading of their own funds.
Holes in the Cheese
Just as these three factors contributed to the investment in banks in 2009, we see most bank shares at artificially high prices, supported by unsustainable multiples, and several reasons to doubt the foundations of U.S. banks. The 10-year Treasury rate and the 30 year fixed mortgage rate are at historic lows amidst a record U.S. fiscal deficit of 1.4 trillion USD in 2009, insisting that the end game will include higher rates on mortgages in the future. Taking it one step further, we see recent strength in the USD index, and an upward trend in the 10 year Treasury Note yield, forcing borrowing costs to rise in 2010 and decreasing the incentives for home owners to buy and traders to trade risky assets. This shift will be doubly negative for banks as rates chip away new found cash flows from mortgage refinances and profits from proprietary trading. Similarly, higher rates in 2010 will force 2009 refinanced payments higher, where ARM's reset at rates above "teasers", and fixed products will become less attractive to new buyers on the margin. The benchmark Treasury Yield (10 year note) illustrates the bottoming of the yield below.
How to Play It
If you look through our archives you'll see that we held a position in the ProShares Double Short Financials ETF (SKF) earlier in 2009. SKF follows the 2x inverse of the DJUSFI and has been on a wild ride over the past two years. I will be the first to tell you that we did very poorly by holding this position, as our assumption that (a) market handicappers would overstep the obvious but short term increases in profits due to the revision of accounting rules (FASB 147) and (b) that trading fees and proprietary trading gains would be short lived for financial firms, as the market topped and returned to a decline in mid summer 2009. You should know that this did not occur and we ended up closing the position in August for a considerable loss.
While we did take a loss, we see SKF as a crucial element to our financial strategy in 2010. We are bearish on blue chip financial firms in 2010, due to the ramifications of rising interest rates, widespread exposure to mortgage defaults, and a tired equity market. However, it is prudent to hedge where value lies, and in financials we found our protection in the obvious favorite.
We are playing the financial volatility with expectations for weakness, by going long Goldman Sachs (GS) and 2x short the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, using an equally weighted long position in SKF. Review the charts below of both names. GS is actually included in the DJUSFI, as the fifth largest holding, yet it's 7.1 p/e and 1.39 price/book make the firm an incredible value, compared to it's DJUSFI peers.
-GS 6 month performance-
-SKF 6 month performance-
By opening positions in both GS and SKF, with an equal share of capital in each, we are playing a sort of bear biased saddle. While we expect financials to fare badly in 2010, GS has relatively little exposure to mortgage issues and has proved that it's innovation will prevail in any environment. The firm has missed earnings estimates only three times since Q2 of 2001, and has exhibited solid dividend yield and earnings per share growth over a 10 year period. By trading this strategy on a weekly basis, we will sell shares and capture gains from the winning position and add this capital to the other vehicle. Should our thesis prove correct, we expect that losses from goldman sachs will be limited, and that their value relative to the financial sector will support share prices in most environments this year.
Remember this is an active trading strategy and unknown market factors can always drastically change pries over short periods of time. For added protection enable loss stops on both positions to protect yourself from extensive losses.
Disclosure: Long GS, Long SKF






